Analyzing Parametric Statistics

Doctorate degree Nursing programIn your review of evidence, you locate a quasi-experimental research study as possible evidence to support a practice change. You notice that the study aims to make a prediction that relates to correlation between study variables. The study sample size is large and normally distributed. Reflect upon this scenario to address the following.· In your appraisal of the evidence, you note that an independent variable is not present and that a Spearman’s ranked correlation is used to analyze data. Is this the correct level of correlational analysis? Explain your rationale.· Are association and correlational analysis equivalent in determining relationships between variables?· Do these findings impact your decision about whether to use this evidence to inform practice change? Why or why not?Reading:Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (Eds.). (2017). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence or nursing practice (10th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.· Chapter 16: Descriptive Statistics· Chapter 17: Inferential Statistics· Chapter 18: Multivariate Statistics· Chapter 19: Processes of Quantitative Data Analysis· Chapter 20: Clinical Significance and Interpretation of Quantitative Result1 page, single spacing.at least 2 references (must be within 5 years so between 2015 and 2020)Absolutely plagirism free. Please run on turnitin.comAPA (7th ed) format.