NRS 429VN Family Assessment Part II

NRS 429VN Family Assessment Part II

Refer back to the interview and evaluation you conducted in the Topic 2 Family Health Assessment assignment.

dentify the social determinates of health (SDOH) contributing to the family’s health status. In a 750-1,000-word paper, create a plan of action to incorporate health promotion strategies for this family. Include the following: Describe the SDOH that affect the family health status. What is the impact of these SDOH on the family? Discuss why these factors are prevalent for this family. Based on the information gathered through the family health assessment, recommend age-appropriate screenings for each family member. Provide support and rationale for your suggestions. Choose a health model to assist in creating a plan of action. Describe the model selected. Discuss the reasons why this health model is the best choice for this family. Provide rationale for your reasoning. Using the model, outline the steps for a family-centered health promotion. Include strategies for communication. Cite at least three peer-reviewed or scholarly sources to complete this assignment. Sources should be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

 

Save your time - order a paper!

Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines

Order Paper Now

Social Health Determinates
Student’s Name
University Affiliation

Social Health Determinates
Introduction
Social factors, to a significant degree, determine the health of individuals and that of populations since they produce widespread inequities within and between societies. These determinants, such as unavailability of income, education, housing, and environmental aspects, can lead to reduced levels of health. Fortunately, the family of Mr. and Mrs. Peterson enjoys these elements since there is a steady flow of income, live in a comfortable house with a quiet environment, and the level of education is above average because the family has a nurse and the grandchildren are attending school. However, well-being is a concern that goes past the allocation of care amenities. In that regard, this family faces adverse social determinants such as the impact of the early life course, health in older age, and social vulnerability. Therefore, this article explores those factors that have worked in this family’s favor and those that have not, provide the age-appropriate screening, create an action plan through a health model, and outline steps for family-centered health promotion.
Discussion
Social determinants shape the environments that individuals are born, grow, live, work, and age. These factors can enable people and communities to flourish or go down the drain. Lovell & Bibby (2018) argue that an exclusive opportunity for excellent health begins long before they require health care. Mr. and Mrs. Peterson’s family seems to live a comfortable life from the outside, but once an individual interacts with them, there is more than what their faces portray. Precisely, a healthy person is that individual accredited with a meaningful job, high self-esteem, secure housing, healthy behaviors, and stable relationships. Fortunately, determinants such as housing, income, and education have worked excellently in favor of Peterson’s family. However, old age health and life’s course have adversely impacted them, inviting vulnerability in society.
Precisely, this family has undergone and witnessed deaths that can be detrimental to them. The more significant majority of family members are of middle age and children, leaving a heavy burden of sustaining the household to their father and grandfather to some. The concept would leave this entity socially vulnerable if anything such as death happened to this pillar. In the meantime, family values exercised have influenced the family positively regardless of the hardships they face. Spending time together, squaring their differences, and the level entertained regarding educations fosters a substantial prevalence of these social factors. Importantly, Lovell & Bibby (2018) agitate that health is more to the physical wellbeing of an individual but also emotional, cultural, and social fitness of the family and society. In that regard, this household beats all odds because these factors are the building blocks of their existence.
Appropriate age screenings
Whether primary care providers use opportunistic preventive counseling and testing once they encounter their patients, corroboration rooted exhortations succor in augmenting coherence, obviate essential exclusions, and reduce redundant screenings. Therefore, the dynamics for advising on such are changing, rendering promotion of quality health and prevention of diseases a daunting task hence the need to choose wisely because it minimizes the demerits associated with extensive screening that has no evidence support (Shimizu, Bouchard & Mavriplis, 2016). In that regard, those above sixties should attend a screening for physical fitness, lipid levels, and cognitive while the rest attend the health care facilities for routine checkups. This is because the family follows their doctor’s prescriptions keenly, but the aging have a higher risk of unseen dangers.
Action health plan model
Human behavior is vital in health maintenance; hence the best model of health is the theory of reasoned action. Precisely, Rutjes, Willemsen & IJsselsteijn (2016) support that health and behavior are strongly collaborative since exercising a healthy lifestyle prevents numerous sicknesses. This model predicts a person’s intention to key in response at a particular place and time. In that regard, the theory explains virtually all behaviors that people actualize the ability to employ self-control, thus able to mediate the factors that influence choices. Arguably, this family has a lot in store for them; hence the more need to understand what sure behavioral portraying might be intended to preempt and then take the necessarily precautionary step. Moreover, it is of high essentiality to create that understanding link among Peterson’s family to avoid such things that annoy the others since they can elevate the social determinants working in their favor currently. Therefore, this model best suits this family because it accommodates all age groups, thus easy to provoke each other.
Family-centered health promotion
The theory of reasoned action suggests that under the right conditions, individuals that sense severe risks due to a particular behavior must try to adopt a healthier one to minimize and eliminate perceived problems. Precisely, the model is a basis of fostering belligerent exertions, shrink those etiquettes that elevate robustness perils, and expedite potent modification and withstanding each other through sustained behavior control. In that regard, every family member should be wary of specific behaviors that provoke others as the foundation of family-centered health promotion and try to evade them. Secondly, it should include the freedom to communicate and correct each other to strengthen that bond, and attending brief educational workshops affect attitudes and beliefs (Burford, 2017) positively. Precisely, witnessing some irritating attributes from a family member and keeping mum about it worsen the situation. In that regard, the theory is self-explanatory hence the need to utilize reasoned actions without undermining each other. Finally, family bonds are not easy to break, thus following the already existing channels; the theory will only strengthen the sweet relationship enjoyed in the household. Their bonding moments, especially while on vacation, is the appropriate avenue to solidify family-based health measures.

Reference
Burford, G. (2017). Family group conferencing: New directions in community-centered child and family practice. Routledge.
Lovell, N., & Bibby, J. (2018). What makes us healthy? An introduction to the social determinants of health. The Health Foundation, London.
Rutjes, H., Willemsen, M. C., & IJsselsteijn, W. A. (2016, April). Understanding effective coaching on healthy lifestyle by combining theory-and data-driven approaches. In PPT@ Persuasive. 26-29.
Shimizu, T., Bouchard, M., & Mavriplis, C. (2016). Update on age-appropriate preventive measures and screening for Canadian primary care providers. Canadian Family Physician. 62(2), 131-138.